이 회차는 실제 기출 문제가 아닙니다. 국가평생교육진흥원 독학학위제 1단계 영어 출제기준(어휘·문법·독해·생활영어 4개 영역)과 최근 회차의 영역별 출제 비율을 참고해, 지문·문장·선택지를 전부 새로 작성한 재구성 연습 문제입니다. 실제 기출 지문이나 문항을 그대로 옮기지 않았습니다. 회차별 정확한 문항 수·배점·시험 시간은 매년 공고가 다를 수 있으므로 응시 전 반드시 해당 연도 공고를 확인하세요.
이 회차의 영역 구성
독학사 1단계 영어는 어휘, 문법, 독해, 생활영어 네 영역에서 객관식 4지선다형으로 출제됩니다. 이 회차는 최근 회차의 통상적인 비율(문법 비중이 가장 크고, 어휘·독해·생활영어가 그 뒤를 잇는 구성)을 본떠 아래와 같이 배분했습니다.
| 영역 | 문항 번호 | 문항 수 |
|---|---|---|
| 어휘 | 1–5 | 5문항 |
| 문법 | 6–13 | 8문항 |
| 독해 | 14–18 | 5문항 |
| 생활영어 | 19–22 | 4문항 |
어휘 (1~5번)
문법 (6~13번)
독해 (14~18번)
다음 지문을 읽고 물음에 답하시오.
Last spring, a small neighborhood in the city decided to convert an empty lot into a shared garden. The project began when a group of residents noticed that the lot had been unused for nearly ten years and was collecting trash instead of serving any purpose. They contacted the local government office, and after several meetings, the city agreed to lend the land to the community for five years. Volunteers cleared the debris, built raised beds, and planted vegetables, herbs, and flowers. Within a few months, the garden supplied fresh produce not only to the families who worked on it but also to a nearby shelter that served free meals every week. The garden also became a place where neighbors who had rarely spoken to each other began to share tools, seeds, and cooking tips. According to the organizers, the biggest surprise was not the amount of food produced but the sense of connection it created among people of different ages and backgrounds. The city has since asked the group to help plan two more gardens in other neighborhoods, and organizers hope the model will spread across the entire city within the next few years.
다음 지문을 읽고 물음에 답하시오.
A research team recently studied how short breaks affect focus among office workers. For four weeks, one group followed their normal schedule, working for long stretches with only a lunch break, while a second group took a five minute break every hour. Both groups reported similar workloads and deadlines throughout the study. At the end of the four weeks, the group that took short hourly breaks completed slightly less work overall, since the constant breaks used up time that could have gone into tasks. However, when tested on accuracy and attention halfway through each afternoon, this group made far fewer mistakes than the group without breaks. Interviews conducted after the study also showed that workers who took frequent breaks reported lower stress and were more willing to keep working past the usual end of the day when a task was unfinished. The researchers concluded that although short breaks slightly reduce raw output, they protect the quality of attention during long afternoons, which matters most for tasks that require careful judgment rather than simple repetition.